Trump budget proposes deep cuts for HHS

William Doss | | Radiology Business | Policy & Regulations

The Trump administration released its detailed budget for HHS, proposing massive budget cuts to several key institutions with a stake in imaging, including the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The NCI would see a budged decrease of $1 billion, or 11 percent. The NCI has regularly funded or published studies showing the efficacy of cancer screening, including a large-scale report detailing the precipitous decline in breast cancer deaths since the implementation of mammography.

Advocacy groups spoke out against President Donald Trump’s proposed budget, including Chris Hansen, president of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (the lobbying arm for the American Cancer Society).

“These budget cuts seriously jeopardize the development of new, potentially life-saving cancer diagnostic tools, prevention methods and treatments,” he said in a statement.

The FDA would see a 31 percent cut, down to $1.89 billion from $2.7 billion. The administration contends the decrease would be offset by doubling industry-paid user fees to $1.5 billion. Currently, user fees cover about 70 percent of the cost of drug applications and about 30 percent of the cost of device reviews.

FDA officials told the Wall Street Journal the plan is unrealistic because the fees have already been negotiated with companies—and the two-year negotiation period isn’t easily reopened.

However, the budget is likely to change drastically once it reaches Congress.

“The president is right to take a close look at spending," Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told NPR. "Congress has the power of the purse strings. I've never seen a president's budget proposal not revised substantially."

William Doss

As a Senior Writer for TriMed Media Group, Will covers radiology practice improvement, policy, and finance. He lives in Chicago and holds a bachelor’s degree in Life Science Communication and Global Health from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He previously worked as a media specialist for the UW School of Medicine and Public Health. Outside of work you might see him at one of the many live music venues in Chicago or walking his dog Holly around Lakeview.

Related Content

Physician Medicare pay fix in jeopardy following criticism from Donald Trump, Elon Musk
Blue Cross Blue Shield affiliate rejects MRI contrast coverage, labeling it ‘investigational’
Radiologists push governor to veto bill that would produce ‘staggering’ increase in liability premiums
Radiology experts say state Medicaid rates must increase to improve imaging access
Policy reforms in Washington that will impact nuclear imaging
U.S. moves closer to establishing domestic supply of Mo-99 for nuclear imaging

Around the web

Health Imaging
Nearly $800,000 settlement offered to family of man who died during MRI exam

The patient, who was being cared for in the ICU, was not accompanied or monitored by nursing staff during his exam, despite being sedated.

Cardiovascular Business
Global shortage of nuclear imaging isotopes may be over

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

Cardiovascular Business
‘A huge win’: CMS significantly increases Medicare payments for cardiac CT

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.