7 questions radiologists must answer about enterprise imaging

Cheryl Petersilge, MD, MBA, with the department of regional radiology at the Cleveland Clinic, examined enterprise imaging — and how radiologists must integrate and collaborate with other departments. Her clinical perspective clinical perspective was published online in the October issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.[1]

“Radiology has been at the forefront of most advances in the infrastructures and workflows for imaging management,” Petersilge wrote. “Radiology can remain at that forefront by embracing the new world of enterprise imaging through carefully selected purchases and through engagement with other image producers in their institution.”

The paper examines the value of enterprise imaging, experiences from Petersilge’s time at the Cleveland Clinic and obstacles faced by the industry in increasing implementation and efficiency.

Sharing radiology images and reports both inside and out of a hospital via enterprise imaging

Petersilge comments that a complete enterprise imaging program must incorporate images produced internally with those from outside a healthcare system. Distribution of images can be shared within a healthcare group, though radiology departments are often best suiting to handle images.

“Many of the other imaging-producing departments are in their infancy and are not equipped to handle these challenges,” Petersilge wrote. “These departments are often smaller and do not have the experience to support these activities. Radiology departments should step in to fill these voids, lending their expertise and increasing their value to the healthcare system.”

Healthcare has faced difficulties in streamlining interoperability and health information exchanges. Radiology departments can take a lead in efficiency sharing and archiving images.

Key questions hospitals should be asked about whether to adopt an enterprise imaging strategy

Challenges are plentiful in improving enterprising imaging. A few things that need to be answered include:

  • Should data be stored in a DICOM format?
  • Is a PACS-based strategy better than a VNA-based one?
  • How can providers meet the varying needs of image producers?
  • How can systems overcome resistance among clinicians?
  • Can radiologists be trained to work closely with nonradiologist image producers?
  • What steps must be taken to reduce redundant imaging across a system?
  • What security threats face radiologists and how can they be prepared to respond?

As the industry begins to formulate answers to these questions, it’s clear enterprise imaging will remain a focal point for radiology departments—which will include time, money and effort to be successful.

“Enterprise imaging is on the horizon for every institution,” she wrote. “Such a program comes with a significant capital cost, and in these times of economic constraints in the healthcare industry, investments must be wisely chosen.”

Find more Enterprise imaging content and videos

""
Nicholas Leider, Managing Editor

Nicholas joined TriMed in 2016 as the managing editor of the Chicago office. After receiving his master’s from Roosevelt University, he worked in various writing/editing roles for magazines ranging in topic from billiards to metallurgy. Currently on Chicago’s north side, Nicholas keeps busy by running, reading and talking to his two cats.

Around the web

After reviewing years of data from its clinic, one institution discovered that issues with implant data integrity frequently put patients at risk. 

Prior to the final proposal’s release, the American College of Radiology reached out to CMS to offer its recommendations on payment rates for five out of the six the new codes.

“Before these CPT codes there was no real acknowledgment of the additional burden borne by the providers who accepted these patients."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup