Context is key when defending radiology claims

In a recent article published in the New York Law Journal, Andrew Kaufman, founding partner of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan, outlines how to handle hindsight bias when it comes to defending radiology claims.

Kaufman discusses how claims against radiologists will result in delays and diagnosis of treatment in progressive diseases such as cancer.

He lists the four main reasons why radiologists are sued:

  • Errors in perception.
  • Errors in interpretation.
  • Failure to suggest the next appropriate step or procedure.
  • Failure to communicate to the patient or clinician in a timely and appropriate manner.

He said errors in perception form the basis for a vast majority of radiology claims: “Coincidentally, such claims are susceptible to a pernicious and insidious form of bias on the part of plaintiff's expert as well as the jury.”

View Kaufman’s stance on these issues: 

Jodelle joined TriMed Media Group in 2016 as a senior writer, focusing on content for Radiology Business and Health Imaging. After receiving her master's from DePaul University, she worked as a news reporter and communications specialist.

Around the web

The new F-18 flurpiridaz radiotracer is expected to help drive cardiac PET growth, but it requires waiting between rest and stress scans. Software from MultiFunctional Imaging can help care teams combat that problem.

News of an incident is a stark reminder that healthcare workers and patients aren’t the only ones who need to be aware around MRI suites.

The ACR hopes these changes, including the addition of diagnostic performance feedback, will help reduce the number of patients with incidental nodules lost to follow-up each year.