Newest ICD-10 bill seeks 18-month grace period, but no delay

The latest legislative activity around ICD-10 implementation does not aim to stop or delay the transition to the a newer version of the codes, but would put in place more rigorous testing and an 18-month grace period after the Oct. 1 deadline.

H.R. 2247, the Increasing Clarity for Doctors by Transitioning Effectively Now Act (ICD-TEN Act), was introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.). The bill would help protect companies from being penalized for routine mistakes that result from the code switch.

ICD-TEN Act also would require HHS to conduct “transparent,” “comprehensive” end-to-end testing to ensure the nation's reimbursement infrastructure is functioning properly, and that end-to-end testing would have to be made available to each vendor participating in the Medicare fee-for-service program.

“During the ICD-10 transition period, it is essential for CMS to ensure a fully functioning payment system and institute safeguards that prevent physicians and hospitals from being unfairly penalized due to coding errors,” Black said in a letter to her fellow legislators. “Reimbursement could be significantly delayed due to simple mistakes in classifying one of ICD-10s thousands of sub-codes. The effects of the change could be overwhelming, particularly for smaller provider offices with fewer resources.”

CMS has already been conducting its own ICD-10 testing throughout the year, which is one reason why the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) said on its website that it does not support the ICD-TEN Act and thinks CMS has shown it is prepared for the Oct. 1 deadline.

Black’s bill comes on the heels of H.R. 2126, the Cutting Costly Codes Act of 2015, which was introduced by Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas) and co-sponsored by six other republican representatives. That bill aims to stop ICD-10 implementation at the gate.

“The new ICD-10 codes will not make one patient healthier,” Poe said in a statement when that bill was first introduced. “What it will do is put an unnecessary strain on the medical community who should be focused on treating patients, not implementing a whole new bureaucratic language. Instead of hiring one more doctor or nurse to help patients, medical practices are having to spend tens of thousands just to hire a specialist who understands the new codes.”

James Madara, the executive vice president and CEO of the American Medical Association (AMA), wrote a letter last week in support of Poe’s bill, saying the timing of ICD-10 implementation “could not be worse” and that physicians were “overwhelmed.” 

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 18 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Around the web

The patient, who was being cared for in the ICU, was not accompanied or monitored by nursing staff during his exam, despite being sedated.

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.