Cost of MRI varies drastically by state, type of facility

MRI costs vary drastically from facility to facility, according to an analysis from Amino, a startup using big data to match patients with providers. American consumers are paying more out of pocket for healthcare than ever before, so choosing where to receive care is a more impactful decision than it’s been in the past.

Hospitals were consistently more expensive than outpatient imaging centers, especially in Alaska and Michigan, where MRIs could cost up to $2,500 more if received at a hospital rather than an imaging center.

These fluctuations in price are important considerations for both consumers and care providers. In the past decade, health price transparency has emerged as a priority for state legislatures, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, and a number of states have enacted regulations requiring additional disclosure of the costs of health services.

Additionally, a recent study found that imaging utilization drastically varied from county to county, with poorly-insured regions using more imaging services—the opposite of what the authors expected. The authors theorized it could stem from poor coordination of care leading to duplicative or unnecessary imaging, which could raise insurance prices across the board in that area.

Follow the link below to read the full story in Business Insider:

As a Senior Writer for TriMed Media Group, Will covers radiology practice improvement, policy, and finance. He lives in Chicago and holds a bachelor’s degree in Life Science Communication and Global Health from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He previously worked as a media specialist for the UW School of Medicine and Public Health. Outside of work you might see him at one of the many live music venues in Chicago or walking his dog Holly around Lakeview.

Around the web

The patient, who was being cared for in the ICU, was not accompanied or monitored by nursing staff during his exam, despite being sedated.

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.